PAL or NTSC

Steinar · Sep 13, 2014 12:05 AM

I tried both.

Test 1:

NTSC (North American version)
The voices in the beginning cutscene didn't sync with the characters, the scene paced too fast for the voices to sync. (I mean it might just be my Disc though, but just so far)
Not too laggy, but i still felt some vibes

PAL

Really laggy gameplay.

Conclusion
NTSC, because 60hz is faster than 50hz.

I mean this game looks really good actually. If this game ran on a Xbox 360 then the wonders would really work. I bet it would be really fast and be awesome. It feels like Spyro 3 with better graphics so far. But i like it for what it is, awesome graphics big_smile

Edit:

Test 2:
Actually when i think about it, i couldn't notice much difference between PAL and NTSC in speed, actually it looks like the PAL version is more smoother, while at some place like far distances the NTSC lags more.

Last edited by Steinar (Sep 13, 2014 1:19 AM)

Flapjacks · Sep 13, 2014 12:57 AM

Steinar · Sep 13, 2014 1:21 AM

Last edited by Steinar (Sep 13, 2014 1:21 AM)

NeoReaper · Sep 13, 2014 10:28 PM

NTSC: 60hz lower frame deliver quality.
PAL: 50hz more detailed frames delivered.
And it did not make much difference since consoles like the PS1 were kept at 30 fps in MOST games and its funny since most older TV's (CRT type ones) had either a very high or very low refresh rate (30-120 if I remember correctly) BUT one problem even with some monitors/tv's today is that a low refresh rate (30-50) will give you a dam great headache after time since you are practically looking at a flashing image. (Fun fact <---)

Last edited by NeoReaper (Sep 13, 2014 10:28 PM)

Steinar · Sep 27, 2014 5:16 PM

Last edited by Steinar (Sep 29, 2014 2:41 PM)

#1 Sep 13, 2014 12:05 AM

PAL or NTSC

#2 Sep 13, 2014 12:57 AM

Re: PAL or NTSC

#3 Sep 13, 2014 1:21 AM

Re: PAL or NTSC

#4 Sep 13, 2014 10:28 PM

Re: PAL or NTSC

#5 Sep 27, 2014 5:16 PM

Re: PAL or NTSC

Board footer