What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

Clawtooth35 · Mar 31, 2007 5:37 PM

What would the next game have been like, How long would they have kept it on PS1.

Give me your thoughts.

TB · Mar 31, 2007 5:39 PM

Clawtooth35 wrote:

What would the next game have been like, How long would they have kept it on PS1.
Give me your thoughts.

Yes! I would have loved that! The only problem is that they would never have gone to make the amazing Rachet and Clank series! I don't know what to choose! neutral

Clawtooth35 · Mar 31, 2007 5:40 PM

Go with your gut!

Paranoia · Mar 31, 2007 6:04 PM

That woul;d be sweet! big_smile

Clawtooth35 · Mar 31, 2007 6:50 PM

^_^ I agree

DanteAndVergil · Mar 31, 2007 10:56 PM

i actually think that the ps1 games had gone to far because year of the dragon was rather boring

TB · Mar 31, 2007 11:02 PM

dragongaz wrote:

i actually think that the ps1 games had gone to far because year of the dragon was rather boring

What! No way in the world! Well I think ANB is kind of boring in its own way! :-P

LoneKnight · Apr 01, 2007 12:48 AM

We'd be in a much better world with Insomniac behind the wheel.

But, remember why they sold the rights to Spyro. They got bored with Spyro. Even if they kept the rights, do you really think we'd see more? They might have just retired him.

Sailorgalaxy · Apr 01, 2007 12:52 AM

Personally, I think Spyro would've been ALOT better off.
VU pretty much messed up the series and Spyro himself (He looks all...deformed now and such).

The Chickmagnet · Apr 01, 2007 1:08 AM

1-3
are the only ones i have and sometimes play

TB · Apr 01, 2007 1:09 AM

Also, there would be no Ratchet and Clank if they kept making Spyro games! :omg:

The Chickmagnet · Apr 01, 2007 1:14 AM

Idc bout
that

I don't play those 2
I barely play Videa Games that ofton anymore

devonm0 · Apr 01, 2007 5:31 AM

Spyro may not have had a future in the hands of Insomniac. The way I see it, we should just go with the flow. I kinda hate the look of the original Spyro, anyway. Also, though Ripto's Rage was better in some ways than the original, all in all, IMPO, each successive game of the original trilogy was worse then the previous.

Jay Tanoshi · Apr 01, 2007 10:48 AM

I'll pretty much go with the 3rd choice.
Why?
Well...the thing is for me that VU's games helped me into the Spyro Series. I never was a fan of the PSX even though I got one, meaning I wasn't into anything Playstation had to offer, not Crash, not Final Fantasy, not Spyro...

I'm not bagging on Insomnaic, I've played the original 3, and they're good. The first one was pretty well done, but got repetitive. Ripto's Rage for me was somewhat better. Year of the Dragon is a great PS game, though...when it comes to addiction level for me, A Hero's Tail, Shadow Legacy, and A New Beginning wins.

I dunno what will happen if Spyro stayed on Insomnaic, though, it could be good. But that does leave a question for the Ratchet and Clank Series, even though I haven't played them. If Insomnaic didn't give Spyro to VU, Ratchet and Clank might not have made the scene.

Though, for me....I'd say it's okay. Doesn't matter in my opinion, though it does leave me curious to find out what would happen to Spyro if he stayed.

Rexy · Apr 01, 2007 12:21 PM

Aside from what's been said, it was Universal that held the rights to Spyro since the series' interception, not Insomniac. While it can be nice to see the series being re-transferred back to them, we also need to take note of the following question - will they even be prepared to make a Spyro title?

I know that it can be tough to see games getting transferred to others' hands. But for some series, it can do them some good. Sonic the Hedgehog's latest great titles have mainly been the handheld ones, and they were developed by Dimps. And I especially adored Mario's RPG/quest like titles; does the Nintendo in-house team have what it takes to make a game like Super Mario RPG on that scale without bugging Squaresoft to actually make the game themselves?

There are even some game franchises that are having problems under their hands of their creators. I'll set Banjo-Kazooie as an example - all of their games were established by Rare. However, somewhere around the Microsoft purchase, their games started to face a struggle to meet up with the quality of their predecessors. Even initial feedback that I saw of Banjo-Threeie saw just as many mixed reactions to how Banjo got rendered as did Spyro's successive new renders in the past four years or so.

On top of that, outside from Spyro, all of Insomniac's games have been of the futuristic variety, and that might have been the kind of game that the guys over there were initially interested in making a living out of in the first place. I think if I was in their shoes, I might feel a little bit awkward and want to seek for more of a challenge.

SpyroGirl101 · Apr 06, 2007 10:43 PM

If insomniac still had Spyro, I would be crying tears of joy. spyro :wub:

ratchet · Apr 22, 2007 5:24 AM

SpyroGirl101 wrote:

If insomniac still had Spyro, I would be crying tears of joy. :Spyro: :wub:

yes, that and no homework would be a miricle

SpyroGirl101 · Apr 22, 2007 8:08 AM

You got that right!

LoneKnight · Apr 22, 2007 10:11 PM

Never going to happen, but I'd play it.

DanteAndVergil · Apr 22, 2007 10:13 PM

if some would read about insomniac they have retired spyro they are no longer interested in spyro end of so spyro coming back to insomniac but it would be good if it did

ratchet · Apr 22, 2007 11:35 PM

yup, its impossible insomniac buy spyro back

LoneKnight · Apr 22, 2007 11:43 PM

Not impossible, but improbible. They just don't want to. They sold it for the reason that they wanted to try new things. What reason would make them randomly buy it again? It's sometimes better to quit while you're ahead, and that's what Insomniac did with Spyro. They quit while they were still hot. As a result we still play these PS1 games.

ratchet · Apr 22, 2007 11:47 PM

yah, i know, and r and c should've been quitted after r and c 3, deadlocked sucked

DanteAndVergil · Apr 22, 2007 11:50 PM

i didnt play much of ratchet and clank but it seemed like it was an entertaining game

#1 Mar 31, 2007 5:37 PM

What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#2 Mar 31, 2007 5:39 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#3 Mar 31, 2007 5:40 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#4 Mar 31, 2007 6:04 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#5 Mar 31, 2007 6:50 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#6 Mar 31, 2007 10:56 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#7 Mar 31, 2007 11:02 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#8 Apr 01, 2007 12:48 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#9 Apr 01, 2007 12:52 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#10 Apr 01, 2007 1:08 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#11 Apr 01, 2007 1:09 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#12 Apr 01, 2007 1:14 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#13 Apr 01, 2007 5:31 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#14 Apr 01, 2007 10:48 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#15 Apr 01, 2007 12:21 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#16 Apr 06, 2007 10:43 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#17 Apr 22, 2007 5:24 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#18 Apr 22, 2007 8:08 AM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#19 Apr 22, 2007 10:11 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#20 Apr 22, 2007 10:13 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#21 Apr 22, 2007 11:35 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#22 Apr 22, 2007 11:43 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#23 Apr 22, 2007 11:47 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

#24 Apr 22, 2007 11:50 PM

Re: What if Insomniac had not sold the Series.

Board footer