BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

cooldude22345 · Dec 09, 2010 11:56 PM

NormanDPlume wrote:

Really now, cooldude22345? Do you know this Razz personally and can speak for this supposed perversion? All you've seen is their art, which often doesn't say much about an artist, especially if such may have been commissioned to do the work. Their art might be popular so you see it everywhere, but that doesn't make them a so-called "hyper-perv". Maybe if you met this person and talked to them about your likes and dislikes they would think of you as a disgusting pervert, instead. One should not judge people one has never met and knows nothing about.

ohnoudidnt

Well, perversion is just an abnormal sexual practice. What, are you going to tell me that SpyroxCynder porn is normal? I don't need to know that person to say that drawing cartoon porn ('specially about a kids game) is perverted, or abnormal.

Disgusting pervert, instead? lolno. Don't try to be over-dramatic.

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 12:03 AM

For artists, drawing porn is just as normal as writing it is for writers and viewing it is for most adults. And you do not take into consideration the simple fact that many artists/writers/etc are paid to draw/write/etc much of this perverted stuff, so it is not they who came up with the ideas in the first place but someone else.

But, really, if you want to play the "normal" card, is talking on a forum about a video game normal? It's about as normal as looking at pornography and is stigmatized in similar ways by society at large.

So I reiterate: don't judge someone you've never even talked to lest that same judgment fall on your own head (and it will).

yearofthe · Dec 10, 2010 12:30 AM

Sure, because animating a dragons pe-is is totally normal.

I can totally understand drawing these kinds of things, but animating is kinda taking it a bit too far.
Like, you want to know how much losers my friends are? They watch animated Naruto Yaio/ Yuri porn videos.
Totally wrong...

cooldude22345 · Dec 10, 2010 12:48 AM

NormanDPlume wrote:

For artists, drawing porn is just as normal as writing it is for writers and viewing it is for most adults. And you do not take into consideration the simple fact that many artists/writers/etc are paid to draw/write/etc much of this perverted stuff, so it is not they who came up with the ideas in the first place but someone else.
But, really, if you want to play the "normal" card, is talking on a forum about a video game normal? It's about as normal as looking at pornography and is stigmatized in similar ways by society at large.
So I reiterate: don't judge someone you've never even talked to lest that same judgment fall on your own head (and it will).

The only flaw in your logic is that there is no way Razz can legitimately get paid to draw Spyro porn. It doesn't matter how 'normal' spyro porn is to someone; that doesn't mean it is normal. Just because you say that the 'artist' thinks it's normal doesn't mean it is. I think sleeping upside down is normal, therefore it is! What great logic~

And don't try to take what I said out of context. By comparing a forum with pornography, you're pretty much telling me how popular the former is. Or are you prepared to give me some proof to back up your claims? Get the majority of people here to agree with those claims, and maybe you'll have a good point.

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 1:20 AM

If you read up on any of the statistics or watch any given news report on pornography, you would know that it is popular.

As for being paid to draw porn versus liking porn: those are two very different things. One can be paid to do a number of things one is not overly interested in (working at a fast food restaurant, being a janitor, selling custom made goods to individuals, etc.). I never said this Razz person thinks of drawing Spyro porn as normal (I don't know them personally, so I can't say). For all any of us knows, they may think it's extremely bizarre but take on this work regardless because they need the money.

You've still managed to miss the more important point here. I'm asking you not to make these gross assumptions about a person you do not know. It speaks ill of you and those like you.

Rurikredwolf · Dec 10, 2010 1:23 AM

NormanDPlume wrote:

Really now, cooldude22345? Do you know this Razz personally and can speak for this supposed perversion? All you've seen is their art, which often doesn't say much about an artist, especially if such may have been commissioned to do the work. Their art might be popular so you see it everywhere, but that doesn't make them a so-called "hyper-perv". Maybe if you met this person and talked to them about your likes and dislikes they would think of you as a disgusting pervert, instead. One should not judge people one has never met and knows nothing about.

I know her well enough to know she does that. So yeah, you can't speak either

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 1:40 AM

Ah, now I have a pronoun to work with. That makes things easier.

What is it she does, pray tell? My paragraph doesn't say anything except to put forth the idea that the poster who brought her up in the first place doesn't know her well enough to say whether she is or is not a so-called "hyper-perv".

cooldude22345 · Dec 10, 2010 3:27 AM

NormanDPlume wrote:

If you read up on any of the statistics or watch any given news report on pornography, you would know that it is popular.
As for being paid to draw porn versus liking porn: those are two very different things. One can be paid to do a number of things one is not overly interested in (working at a fast food restaurant, being a janitor, selling custom made goods to individuals, etc.). I never said this Razz person thinks of drawing Spyro porn as normal (I don't know them personally, so I can't say). For all any of us knows, they may think it's extremely bizarre but take on this work regardless because they need the money.
You've still managed to miss the more important point here. I'm asking you not to make these gross assumptions about a person you do not know. It speaks ill of you and those like you.

Well, bottom line, Razzek has a strange perversion for Spyro. How do I know? Her art. She doesn't get paid for Spyro porn, but she still draws it. Gross assumption? No. I'm calling her perversion strange.

Yeah, your argument would work only if she did get paid to draw Spyro porn. Which, guess what? She doesn't. A janitor wouldn't work for nothing, and neither would a burger-joint employee. But hey, if the janitor chooses to work anyways, I can assume he likes his job. So if Razz draws spyro porn for free, I can assume she likes it.

A pervert is someone who's sexual behavior differs from what is normal. Drawing Spyro porn? Not normal.

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=c … and+cynder

Look if you dare. (it's not an actual webpage, just search results from google.) Now look around and tell me if you can find anything that indicates that razz gets paid for Spyro porn.

yearofthe · Dec 10, 2010 3:36 AM

Look.

That video = porn
porn = sex
sex = love
love = normal

Of course its normal.

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 3:43 AM

The only links I see are to what amounts to an image site, which tells you absolutely nothing about an artists' motives. The first link wasn't even pornographic, it was just a goofy comic. Seeing a picture someone has drawn is not the same as talking to that person, and your interpretation of said picture is not always the artist's intent. You still don't know her and are making assumptions based on work she may have done years ago and for reasons you are not privy to. I don't know where to find her (a Google search turned up a jazz band and a kind of poker), but if someone does, maybe they can ask her about it and get the real story instead of a group of strangers on a video game forum just assuming they know anything about what's going on.

Also, it would appear that you've linked to a large number of links that are inappropriate. Maybe a mod should do something about this topic if we're going to be linking to porn here (something that I don't believe is allowed on these forums).

If I recall right, there's a Razz mentioned as a mod of these very forums in the first post of this topic. Why is her help asked for (if this is indeed the same person) if she is the indirect instigator of the problem?

cooldude22345 · Dec 10, 2010 3:43 AM

yearofthe wrote:

Look.
That video = porn
porn = sex
sex = love
love = normal
Of course its normal.

NONONO. PORN NO = LOVE

... It's kinky sex made for viewer pleasure.

cooldude22345 · Dec 10, 2010 3:49 AM

NormanDPlume wrote:

Why is her help asked for (if this is indeed the same person) if she is the indirect instigator of the problem?

This is kind of, you know, what I meant when I, you know, replied to malik after I, you know, lol'd.

and LOLZ you looked through them... ]D

Well, whatever razz's intentions were, she still drew SPYRO PORN. Is it a strange perversion? Yes.

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 3:51 AM

It depends on the porn. Sometimes sex is for love, sometimes it's not. Sex itself, however, is one of the most basic and normal human functions. There are very few professional artists (animators, freelancers, game designers, etc.) who do not engage in what is known as "bored animator syndrome", where they draw erotica of the projects they are working on. It has nothing to do with being kinky and everything to do with being an adult human being. I don't expect many of you to understand this because, frankly, most of you are too young. When you're done with puberty and have had a few years to adjust, most of this will make more sense.

Anyway, I'd like to request that a mod lock/delete this topic. None of this is stuff that should be discussed on a forum that (supposedly) has strict rules against discussing adult subject matter since most of its members are not of legal age. This thread has already instigated the sharing of illegal pornographic content on the forums and inspired users who would not otherwise have been interested in such material to go looking for it.

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 3:54 AM

cooldude22345 wrote:

NormanDPlume wrote:
Why is her help asked for (if this is indeed the same person) if she is the indirect instigator of the problem?
This is kind of, you know, what I meant when I, you know, replied to malik after I, you know, lol'd.
and LOLZ you looked through them... ]D
Well, whatever razz's intentions were, she still drew SPYRO PORN. Is it a strange perversion? Yes.

A perversion is usually considered to be something one does for sexual gratification. You, sir (or madam), do not know this woman even remotely well enough to judge whether she drew this work for personal reasons like that and I find your assumptions of such very childish and crude in the extremes.

For the record, I clicked the first link only and just read the text descriptions of the others. You seem very fond of gross assumptions about people you barely know.

yearofthe · Dec 10, 2010 3:58 AM

I'm really surprised I haven't been suspended yet.
Anyway, mods aren't really around that much.
So, I guess the best thing to do is report it. (Can't hurt to try.)

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 4:02 AM

I've sent a note to Spyrorocks since he appears to be the one in charge. I'll report the thread as well, if anyone can tell me how that's done.

cooldude22345 · Dec 10, 2010 4:09 AM

*gasp* Blasphemy!

Well, car ride is over, so I gotta get off the cell phone. Ya, it was amusing arguing with you too ;D

JazzJackrabbit · Dec 10, 2010 4:19 AM

NormanDPlume wrote:

I've sent a note to Spyrorocks since he appears to be the one in charge. I'll report the thread as well, if anyone can tell me how that's done.

You'll find out when you're older. If you know how to quote, you probably almost did it before.

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 4:29 AM

I'm in my thirties, friend, I suspect I'm plenty old enough. Every forum is different, though, and it sometimes takes more poking about than one has energy for to find these things. I should hope that I'm not the only person here who doesn't think this topic is fit to keep going as it is on these boards. If I am, perhaps my initial instinct to stay off these forums was right and the rumors of this site are more true than I wanted to believe.

yearofthe · Dec 10, 2010 4:41 AM

On the first post, hit the red "!" which is on the far right.
Then submit why you want to report it.

cooldude22345 · Dec 10, 2010 4:41 AM

NormanDPlume wrote:

I'm in my thirties, friend, I suspect I'm plenty old enough. Every forum is different, though, and it sometimes takes more poking about than one has energy for to find these things. I should hope that I'm not the only person here who doesn't think this topic is fit to keep going as it is on these boards. If I am, perhaps my initial instinct to stay off these forums was right and the rumors of this site are more true than I wanted to believe.

LOLZ

Dude, I thought you'd be twenty or something, but this is just fail.

Oh, and welcome to the internet.

yearofthe · Dec 10, 2010 4:44 AM

Anyway, I reported this topic. I suggest you do the same as I mention in my previous post.

Also, in the report I stated:
"It's pretty self-explanatory."

NormanDPlume · Dec 10, 2010 5:00 AM

Thanks very much for the help. I was looking for something that said "report"; I never even saw the "!".

yearofthe · Dec 10, 2010 5:35 AM

Yeah, I still don't see why the user had to post this topic.
I think Malik_the_Dragon could've contacted Google first
and not posting something that's not necessary to be on this
forum in the first place. >.>

I just hope nobody does the same with Hunter and Bianca. o_O
Also, I love that show when I was a kid (Danny Phantom. XD)

Jackson117 · Dec 10, 2010 7:20 AM

It's true that Walt did inspire the Magna we know today but The word was used ages again Walt did not invent Magna, Magna was around far beyond as nothing but pictures on paper, Tentacle erotica existed as Dreams of a fisher man's wife. In short, 200 years ago Magna, anime was nothing but drawn strips, now before you even ask of it...No...It wasn't a drawing..it was a nameless design that seems to somehow be called magna.

I do seem to have a blunt statement in the latter but all I hear is over confusing to the point of losing myself.

Oh sure...Vore is so about getting mauled and having your intestines ripped out for the sexyness...most vore is just getting swallowed alive in the case.

Furry fandom did not invent Tentacle erotica, nor did western times...It was hinted but that's like saying someone who wanted to make a great bug engine 5 years ago now states he made up google and they stole it.

I'm going to hate to say it but this started to all become worse and worse ever since Disney's Robin hood came out...it's getting to the point that soon aliens will be called furries...

#51 Dec 09, 2010 11:56 PM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#52 Dec 10, 2010 12:03 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#53 Dec 10, 2010 12:30 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#54 Dec 10, 2010 12:48 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#55 Dec 10, 2010 1:20 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#56 Dec 10, 2010 1:23 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#57 Dec 10, 2010 1:40 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#58 Dec 10, 2010 3:27 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#59 Dec 10, 2010 3:36 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#60 Dec 10, 2010 3:43 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#61 Dec 10, 2010 3:43 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#62 Dec 10, 2010 3:49 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#63 Dec 10, 2010 3:51 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#64 Dec 10, 2010 3:54 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#65 Dec 10, 2010 3:58 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#66 Dec 10, 2010 4:02 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#67 Dec 10, 2010 4:09 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#68 Dec 10, 2010 4:19 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#69 Dec 10, 2010 4:29 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#70 Dec 10, 2010 4:41 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#71 Dec 10, 2010 4:41 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#72 Dec 10, 2010 4:44 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#73 Dec 10, 2010 5:00 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#74 Dec 10, 2010 5:35 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

#75 Dec 10, 2010 7:20 AM

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! *read this post*

Board footer

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post

Re: BIG MEETING, RIGHT NOW!!! read this post