Rankings

Antr the Rolf · Mar 20, 2008 6:46 PM

Hey SpyroRocks..maybe can we have like..rankings for people..not trying to be nasty and stuff..It would just seem even more fun!

LoneKnight · Mar 21, 2008 12:34 AM

Well, we used to have rankings if I remember correctly. However, rankings based on Post Count don't work, because a lot of the time, people post just to increase their rank.

shadowsfall · Mar 21, 2008 12:53 AM

thats just not right.
hey ummm what do you mean arcane x when you say not trying to be nasty and stuff?

Doppelgangergang · Mar 21, 2008 2:24 AM

Antr the Rolf · Mar 21, 2008 2:56 AM

No..I'm saying that if some are better ranked than others,so It would seem fair.And not to be an @$$
to those of a different rank.

Doppelgangergang · Mar 21, 2008 3:02 AM

Okay... How do you tell and rank a person automatically?

Spyro · Mar 21, 2008 3:35 AM

I so often see on forums (like GameFAQs) that ranking causes a terrible hierarchy. When a post with a typo, grammar or spelling error is made those of higher rank make fun of those of lower rank who made a said mistake. Originally we had a ranking system planned - you'd start off as a dragon egg, then be a hatchling, then a fledgling, then a baby dragon, so on and so forth. We abandoned it in fear of how ranks cause turmoil among egotistical members.

Antr the Rolf · Mar 21, 2008 3:51 AM

Oh..then nevermind..I don't want the site to go into a State of Rage.

Keby · May 23, 2008 3:14 AM

Really? I never thought so much chaos could be caused over ranks. I think a ranking system would be great, but if it really could cause this many problems then maybe not.

#1 Mar 20, 2008 6:46 PM

Rankings

#2 Mar 21, 2008 12:34 AM

Re: Rankings

#3 Mar 21, 2008 12:53 AM

Re: Rankings

#4 Mar 21, 2008 2:24 AM

Re: Rankings

#5 Mar 21, 2008 2:56 AM

Re: Rankings

#6 Mar 21, 2008 3:02 AM

Re: Rankings

#7 Mar 21, 2008 3:35 AM

Re: Rankings

#8 Mar 21, 2008 3:51 AM

Re: Rankings

#9 May 23, 2008 3:14 AM

Re: Rankings

Board footer