Last LoS game

T3h0v4llu · Feb 23, 2009 1:19 PM

TornWings wrote:

LordCrump10 wrote:
Maybe Blizzard can step in and throw Spyro to one of their well known development studios. No offense to either Krome or ELB, but I'd bet 95% of the gaming world wouldn't have a clue as to who either of these studios were prior to the Legend trilogy. Now that it's done, I'd say there's still probably a good 70% of the gaming world that would STILL not know Krome or ELB. >_>
...Or maybe it will just be what happened with SC:Ghost where the game undergoes studio switches in the company and eventually falls into obscurity....
Yeah, seeing as it's not an entirely proven franchaise, don't expect anything. Blizzard isn't a fan of taking risks, from what I've seen. Kind of sad as they could probably do a good job with it.

Good thing is that blizzard DOESNT need money. Its good because now they can focus on making good games without turning it into some commercial *bleep*.

RedDragonX · Feb 23, 2009 8:29 PM

Blizzard would have no reason to. They don't work with games like Spyro and never will. Doesn't matter because I did think EL did a good job...just could have been better as always.

Rurikredwolf · Feb 23, 2009 11:14 PM

I can see the new title.....

...The Legend of Cynder: Here ya go fantards!

Taco Godess · Feb 23, 2009 11:46 PM

Rurikredwolf wrote:

I can see the new title.....
...The Legend of Cynder: Here ya go fantards!

*snicker*

RedDragonX · Feb 23, 2009 11:49 PM

Rurikredwolf wrote:

I can see the new title.....
...The Legend of Cynder: Here ya go fantards!

Hahaha....I'm in a good mood now.

TornWings · Feb 24, 2009 12:27 AM

T3h0v4llu wrote:

Good thing is that blizzard DOESNT need money. Its good because now they can focus on making good games without turning it into some commercial *bleep*.

That's not how it works. Now they can afford to be lazy, hence why it took them this long to start to make SC2. And like with SC:Ghost, they'll probably take in some smaller studio and put them to work on it.

But, like RDX said, wouldn't happen anyway. I'd rather they stick with ELB as well, there's no telling what would happen when you switch studios, just look at the difference between TEN and DotD, there's a lack of consistency that (hopefully) wouldn't be there if they'd stayed with Krome the whole way through.

T3h0v4llu · Feb 25, 2009 2:49 PM

TornWings wrote:

T3h0v4llu wrote:
Good thing is that blizzard DOESNT need money. Its good because now they can focus on making good games without turning it into some commercial *bleep*.
That's not how it works. Now they can afford to be lazy, hence why it took them this long to start to make SC2. And like with SC:Ghost, they'll probably take in some smaller studio and put them to work on it.
But, like RDX said, wouldn't happen anyway. I'd rather they stick with ELB as well, there's no telling what would happen when you switch studios, just look at the difference between TEN and DotD, there's a lack of consistency that (hopefully) wouldn't be there if they'd stayed with Krome the whole way through.

Not rushing the game means "lazy"? You probably like rushed games dont you? As ive said before, id rather let them take their time than be playing a game that SUCKS.

Aura24 · Feb 25, 2009 7:50 PM

Let's not forget about Enter the Dragonfly, a Spyro game that was rushed, and look how it came out. Glitches, long loading screens, and many other bad ingame errors. It would take a few years to make the next Spyro game without those kinds of errors, probably not a short game this time, and we surely don't want it to be like ETD.

T3h0v4llu · Feb 25, 2009 8:23 PM

None of the tlos games have glitches like ETD has. So do you think they would have them in the next one just for fun? I think they are not THAT stupid, atleast.

Aura24 · Feb 26, 2009 12:31 AM

No, I'm saying that we shouldn't rush the developers and let them take their time, or the next Spyro game will probably be like ETD.

RedDragonX · Feb 26, 2009 3:07 AM

I'm pretty sure that whatever they come out with next will not be rushed. I mean let's look at it like this.....now that DotD is out....and came with pretty good sales.....I think it's pretty certain to say that they will be making another game like they said they would....and by this point they are def making plans on it..

But this will not be rushed I'm pretty sure....they are not going to come out with anything until at least after this movie comes out...which is at the end of this year...my guess is that we will see anouncements for the next game about two years after DotD came out...but that's just what I think.

T3h0v4llu · Feb 26, 2009 7:57 PM

Aura24 wrote:

No, I'm saying that we shouldn't rush the developers and let them take their time, or the next Spyro game will probably be like ETD.

Okay, sorry for not reading your post well enough. Same here.

#26 Feb 23, 2009 1:19 PM

Re: Last LoS game

#27 Feb 23, 2009 8:29 PM

Re: Last LoS game

#28 Feb 23, 2009 11:14 PM

Re: Last LoS game

#29 Feb 23, 2009 11:46 PM

Re: Last LoS game

#30 Feb 23, 2009 11:49 PM

Re: Last LoS game

#31 Feb 24, 2009 12:27 AM

Re: Last LoS game

#32 Feb 25, 2009 2:49 PM

Re: Last LoS game

#33 Feb 25, 2009 7:50 PM

Re: Last LoS game

#34 Feb 25, 2009 8:23 PM

Re: Last LoS game

#35 Feb 26, 2009 12:31 AM

Re: Last LoS game

#36 Feb 26, 2009 3:07 AM

Re: Last LoS game

#37 Feb 26, 2009 7:57 PM

Re: Last LoS game

Board footer